Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the trial of the Uhuru 3 and the actions of the Biden administration. The statement implies a critique of the administration's actions and aligns with a broader conversation about civil rights and political dissent.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as inflammatory by attributing a racial motive to the Biden administration's actions. This could potentially incite division. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a serious accusation against the Biden administration without providing evidence.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to aim at rallying opposition against the administration. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad accusation without engaging in a nuanced discussion or providing evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible by making unsubstantiated claims.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.