Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes Jill Stein for allegedly not contributing to the growth of the Green Party since 2016, while the conversation and image provided by @NaturalGuard counter this claim by showing her active support for a Green Party candidate in 2020. The tone of the statement is sarcastic and dismissive, which can be seen as undermining the contributions of Jill Stein. The conversation also includes a comparison with another political figure, AOC, which introduces an element of personal attack.
- The statement's sarcastic tone and dismissive nature could be seen as harmful, as it undermines the efforts of an individual without substantial evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Jill Stein, as it dismisses her contributions without acknowledging the evidence provided. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is dismissive and sarcastic. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a personal attack on Jill Stein and AOC, rather than constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.