The statement expresses frustration with Democrats' reactions to the speaker's vote for Jill Stein and suggests a form of protest by displaying support for Stein more visibly. The tone is somewhat confrontational and defensive, indicating a personal stance on a political issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a retaliatory action, which could escalate tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does show a lack of respect for differing opinions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more about expressing personal frustration. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a personal retort. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or constructive. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.