Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
9/4/2024, 9:39:17 PM
X
In reply to:
Thomas G. Dietterich
@tdietterich
·
511d
@GaryMarcus Community notes is slow, but is it actually broken?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
511d
This site has become a real PoS.

Community Notes is broken. X is broken. The person posting this [10M views] appears to be funded by the Russian government & people in the picture don’t even have normal numbers of fingers.

Nobody even cares.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
511d
Dude apparently funded by Russia spreads misinformation; gets nearly 10M views on X.

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing the functionality and reliability of a social media platform's feature (Community Notes) and the spread of misinformation. The tone of the conversation is critical and somewhat accusatory, particularly regarding the spread of misinformation and the platform's response to it.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @tdietterich does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader conversation that includes accusations of misinformation and platform failure. The initial statement by @GaryMarcus uses strong language ('PoS') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation involves accusations of misinformation and funding by a foreign government, which could be seen as a violation of privacy and dignity. However, it is also addressing a public concern about misinformation. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on criticism and accusations. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation includes personal attacks and strong language, particularly in @GaryMarcus's statements, which do not foster constructive dialogue. [-2]