Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the authenticity of a photo and the spread of misinformation, which are relevant societal issues. The tone is somewhat confrontational, questioning the credibility of the information shared by another user.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that the other user might be spreading false information, which could be seen as a form of harm if not substantiated. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but questions the dignity of the other user by implying they might be afraid of algorithmic downgrading.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on challenging the other user's credibility. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the validity of the information but does so in a somewhat confrontational manner, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses the platform to challenge misinformation, which can be seen as an attempt to better societal discourse. [+1]