Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement and the conversation it is part of constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue involving political figures and the veracity of information being circulated about them. The tone is investigative and somewhat skeptical, aiming to clarify the truth behind a viral image and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm; it seeks to clarify misinformation, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the facts rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing clarification about the image and the claims made. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the misinformation and providing a source for verification. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by seeking to correct misinformation and provide accurate information. [+1]