Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the behavior of political figures and their interactions with the press. The tone is sarcastic and critical, with a clear intent to compare two political figures and imply a negative judgment about one of them.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses sarcasm and a derogatory hashtag to criticize Kamala Harris, which can be seen as harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Kamala Harris, as it engages in a form of cyberbullying by using the hashtag #CowardKamala. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it fosters division and negativity. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack by calling Kamala Harris a coward. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it engages in name-calling and does not contribute to a constructive public discourse. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.