Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
513d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the actions and positions of a public figure (AOC) and their implications on societal issues such as plutocracy and genocide. The tone is critical and accusatory, expressing disappointment and shifting support to another public figure (Dr. Jill Stein).
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language like 'genocide enabler' which can be harmful and inflammatory. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of AOC, as it engages in harsh criticism that borders on personal attack. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses strong, accusatory language rather than fostering a productive conversation. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, given the harsh and potentially harmful language. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.