Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
513d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public figures and political issues, specifically addressing the authenticity and actions of politicians.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a divisive atmosphere by contrasting two public figures in a potentially negative light. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does indirectly question the dignity of AOC and Pelosi by implying they are not true activists.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it instead sets up a comparison that could foster division. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a comparative assertion without providing substantive reasoning or evidence, which could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform to foster a responsible or constructive dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.