In reply to:
The statement 'Would especially expect to see this show up in latency cc @tdietterich' is part of a broader conversation about the functionality and biases of Community Notes on a social media platform. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the effectiveness, potential manipulation, and demographic shifts affecting Community Notes. This qualifies as public discourse as it engages with issues related to social media governance, misinformation, and public accountability.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral observation about latency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a technical observation about latency. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.