Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
9/5/2024, 1:21:50 AM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
507d
For example:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
507d
13 million views, no community note, and the first sentence is an absolute lie.

Neither Walz’s brother or sister are in this photo of “the *entire* family”; these are “distant cousins”, if the photo is even real. (Note the nose on the guy with the baseball hat, the old woman…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
507d
It is - and you, Elon, are f’ing it up by reposting Russian propaganda.

Hope you are proud of yourself.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
507d
I have never been materially active in politics before, but this time I think civilization as we know it is on the line.

If we want to preserve freedom and a meritocracy in America, then Trump must win.

The statement 'promoting and/or reposting. (Edit button doesn’t work in threads.)' is a reply in a conversation that involves public discourse about political endorsements, misinformation, and the role of influential figures in spreading information. The tone of the statement is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the act of reposting content is contributing to the spread of misinformation. The intent appears to be to call out and criticize the behavior of reposting potentially misleading information.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight the harm caused by reposting misinformation, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the act of reposting rather than attacking individuals personally. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by pointing out the issue of misinformation, but it could be more constructive in its approach.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the action rather than the individual. [+1]