Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
Stuart Buck
@stuartbuck1
·
507d
@GaryMarcus And what's this?
9/5/2024, 1:57:46 AM
X
In reply to:
Cognitive Dissonance
@model_collapse
·
507d
@DHuskytron @GaryMarcus That caught my attention but after reviewing it more, it’s still consistent. Same with the old woman’s right hand, at first perhaps looks off but further review its likely the orientation that makes it look like that
D. HuskyTron
@DHuskytron
·
507d
@GaryMarcus I think the odds are pretty high. The "feet" under and directly to the right of the "chair" don't feel right to me either.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
507d
Odds that this photo is a deep fake, given three signs I point to below?

(Zoom into see the twisted nose.)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
507d
13 million views, no community note, and the first sentence is an absolute lie.

Neither Walz’s brother or sister are in this photo of “the *entire* family”; these are “distant cousins”, if the photo is even real. (Note the nose on the guy with the baseball hat, the old woman…

The statement '@model_collapse @DHuskytron' is a brief reply in a conversation about the authenticity of a photo. The conversation involves a discussion on whether the photo is a deep fake, with various users pointing out potential inconsistencies in the image. This discussion touches on the broader issue of misinformation and the reliability of visual media, which is a public concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement itself does not cause harm, but the broader conversation it is part of could potentially cause harm if it spreads misinformation.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is part of a conversation that could lead to a better understanding of the issue of deep fakes.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement is part of a conversation that could use influence for the betterment of society by addressing the issue of misinformation. [+1]