Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement in question is a response to a discussion about the authenticity of a photo, which has been suggested to be a deep fake. The tone of the statement is dismissive and somewhat mocking, focusing on perceived physical oddities in the photo to argue against the deep fake claim. The statement does not engage in a substantive discussion about the public issue at hand (the authenticity of the photo and its implications) and instead resorts to personal attacks and ridicule.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it mocks the physical appearances of individuals in the photo, which can be hurtful and disrespectful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it engages in cyberbullying by making fun of people's physical features. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ridicule rather than addressing the argument about the photo's authenticity. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.