Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 83

@andmar74 this took me thirty seconds (thought it is 9 rather than the requested 8). high frequency text is somewhat manageable.

jury is still out, but your assumptions need to be reconsidered.

9/5/2024, 3:02:07 AM

In reply to:

andmar74🇩🇰🔭🚀🤖▶️🐧

@andmar74

506d

@GaryMarcus Show me an AI generated image with accurate text on 8 t-shirts, in the same image.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

506d

@andmar74 did you actually try? high frequency text isn’t necessarily a problem:

andmar74🇩🇰🔭🚀🤖▶️🐧

@andmar74

506d

@GaryMarcus AI can't do text that well. The image looks real to me.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

506d

The oddities in this photo keep mounting.

ThomasB

@thomas_brooke_

506d

@karmacondon @WaseemWtesqie @GaryMarcus I just took it for real until I saw Gary's post. Looking further, the younger woman in front, I can see fingernail polish on one hand but not the other. And esp look at her neck, too. And then also look at her neck compared to the matriarch. Still challenging for me but suspect.

The statement and the accompanying image are part of a discussion about the capabilities of AI in generating images with accurate text. The conversation involves a challenge to create an AI-generated image with specific text on multiple t-shirts, and the response includes an image that attempts to meet this challenge. The tone is technical and evaluative, focusing on the performance of AI technology rather than on any political or social issues.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not cause harm and is focused on a technical evaluation, thus adhering to the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding of AI capabilities and limitations, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology without personal attacks, adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]