The statement and the accompanying image engage in a political discussion about family members' voting preferences, which can be considered public discourse. The tone is somewhat confrontational and aims to question the relevance of the family members' political choices by pointing out that they are second cousins, not immediate family members.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the second cousins' political choices, which might indirectly cause emotional harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy to some extent by not revealing personal details but does mention family relationships, which could be seen as a slight invasion of privacy. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it questions the validity of the second cousins' political choices. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by questioning the relevance of the second cousins' votes, but it does so in a somewhat dismissive manner, which could be seen as a minor personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.