In reply to:
Mike Leingang
@LgSunDevil04
·
132d
The statement '@LgSunDevil04 Trump spent a lot more time at the golf course' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a political debate about the work ethic and behavior of a public figure, specifically a former president, in response to a discussion about the current president's actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a polarized and potentially hostile environment. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Neutral.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of a retort in a political debate. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a personal attack on a former president rather than a substantive critique of policies or actions. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it contributes to a polarized and unproductive discourse. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.