Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and accompanying image discuss an experiment comparing human and AI capabilities in understanding leet code, a form of text where letters are replaced with similar-looking numbers. The tone is informative and slightly provocative, aiming to highlight a perceived limitation of AI compared to human cognition.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and is focused on sharing experimental results, thus adhering to the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the differences between human and AI capabilities, encouraging further exploration and discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by presenting experimental results and inviting further discussion on the topic, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to contribute to the betterment of society by fostering a discussion on the capabilities and limitations of AI, which is a significant public concern. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.