In reply to:
casey armstrong
@asbelcas
·
501d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
501d
The statement and the accompanying images constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about advancements in neuroscience over the past decade. The conversation invites opinions and reflections on the progress in data collection, data analysis, and theoretical understanding in neuroscience.
- The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on an academic discussion about neuroscience advancements. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by inviting others to share their perspectives and engage in a constructive dialogue about the topic. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue by asking for agreement or disagreement and reflecting on a scholarly source. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.