Gary Marcus

The statement in question is part of a larger conversation about the X (formerly Twitter) algorithm and its impact on user engagement. The specific statement expresses frustration and a decision to leave, referring to someone as a 'capricious child-emperor,' which is likely a reference to Elon Musk. This statement does touch upon public discourse as it engages with the broader issue of social media algorithms and their impact on user behavior and freedom of speech.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm, but the use of 'capricious child-emperor' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a derogatory term to describe a public figure. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack by calling someone a 'capricious child-emperor.' [-2]
4. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be considered irresponsible due to the personal attack. [-1]