Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
9/5/2024, 4:03:44 PM
X
In reply to:
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
·
501d
@GaryMarcus @crikey_news Everyday usage of the actual models. This study used Llama2 on a particularly difficult dataset
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
501d
@nlpnyc @crikey_news counter examples?
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
·
501d
@GaryMarcus @crikey_news 🍒🍒 🍒🍒 🍒
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
502d
Crikey! “AI worse than humans in every way at summarizing information … the technology might actually make more work for people, not less”

@crikey_news

The statement 'No I mean real world success stories with data on summarization' is part of a public discourse on the effectiveness of AI in summarizing information. The conversation involves a critique of AI's performance compared to humans, referencing a study and seeking counterexamples or success stories. The tone is inquisitive and seeks to engage in a constructive dialogue by requesting empirical evidence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on seeking information rather than attacking others. It adheres to this principle well. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by asking for real-world success stories and data, which can help clarify the discussion. It adheres to this principle well. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue by asking for evidence rather than making personal attacks. It adheres to this principle well. [+1]