Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
9/5/2024, 5:31:35 PM
X
In reply to:
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
路
499d
@GaryMarcus @HiFromMichaelV Conservatives Michael mentioned (whose reaction is the important one here) shied away from the old Twitter
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
499d
@HiFromMichaelV After Elon initially promoted it. 馃檮

And old Twitter would absolutely have freaked about it.
michael vassar
@HiFromMichaelV
路
499d
@GaryMarcus What I鈥檓 seeing these days is dominated by right wing Twitter freaking out in a totally correct and appropriate way against Tucker Carlson and MartyrMade for their support for Hitler.

That鈥檚 the defensive reaction we needed and would never have happened with the old Twitter.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
499d
What has and has not changed around here:

Twitter, pre Elon: leaned on by US government, to suppress hate speech and lies

X: indirectly influenced by Russian government, to amplify hate speech and lies

Honestly, I prefer the old days.

The statement engages in a discussion about the political dynamics and user behavior on Twitter, particularly in relation to the platform's changes under Elon Musk's ownership. It addresses public concerns about free speech, political bias, and the influence of prominent figures, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a neutral observation about the presence of various political figures and their followers on Twitter.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of an observational comment.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a constructive dialogue by providing context and historical perspective on the political spectrum of Twitter users. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.聽[+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a discussion about public issues without spreading misinformation or engaging in harmful rhetoric.聽[+1]