In reply to:
David Hinkle
@Drachs1978
·
499d
The statement engages in a discussion about misinformation, government influence, and the integrity of social media platforms, which are substantive public issues. The tone is accusatory and suggests a strong opinion about the influence of foreign governments on social media platforms.
- The statement does not explicitly strive to do no harm, and the accusatory tone could contribute to a hostile environment. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement accuses a specific entity (Putin) of funding lies, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it contributes to a polarized and accusatory dialogue. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong accusation without providing evidence or engaging in a reasoned debate. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible and lacking integrity due to the accusatory and unsubstantiated nature of the claim. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.