In reply to:
ᐸGerardSans/ᐳ🚀🇬🇧
@gerardsans
·
498d
The statement in question is a reply within a conversation about a new paper on Large Language Models (LLMs) and their capabilities. The tone of the statement is confrontational and dismissive, suggesting that the person being addressed has not fully read the previous replies and is embarrassing themselves by commenting prematurely. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue related to AI and LLMs.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is dismissive and potentially hurtful, which could be seen as harmful. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and borders on cyberbullying by suggesting that the person is embarrassing themselves. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it is confrontational. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack by implying that the person is embarrassing themselves. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.