Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
9/5/2024, 7:04:31 PM
X
In reply to:
Amir Husain
@amirhusain_tx
·
498d
@GaryMarcus @DanHendrycks Which army of experts inside gov will analyze "safety plans" & add value? How will gov retain them at gov wages? Which excellent practitioner wants this job? Will likely be another red tape fiasco. Hold products (not AI) to performance standards. They don't deliver? Sue the co.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
498d
@amirhusain_tx @DanHendrycks AI is 75 years old. It’s time to start
Amir Husain
@amirhusain_tx
·
498d
@GaryMarcus @DanHendrycks Thank God indeed! Wright Bros flew in 1903. FAA est. in 1958. If it had been established in 1904, perhaps there would be no airline industry?

From 1903;s Kitty hawk flyer to 1967/72's 737 & A300.

In 2024 what's flying? The 737 & A300.

Hope AI does better.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
498d
@amirhusain_tx @DanHendrycks Thank god airlines and airports don’t need to have safety plans.
Amir Husain
@amirhusain_tx
·
498d
@DanHendrycks @GaryMarcus I love Scott. But he lost me at “submit safety plan to the government.” I think he thinks too much of government…
Dan Hendrycks
@DanHendrycks
·
499d
Scott Aaronson in support of SB 1047
http://scottaaronson.blog/?p=826…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the role of government regulation in AI safety, comparing it to existing regulatory bodies in aviation. The tone is assertive and aims to counter an argument against government involvement in AI safety.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a reasoned argument rather than an attack. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by drawing parallels between AI regulation and existing aviation safety bodies, fostering a more informed discussion. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the argument directly without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to contribute to a public debate on AI safety. [+2]