Gary Marcus

The statement by @Steve3449 engages in public discourse by addressing the potential misuse of state power by a political figure, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is critical and accusatory, focusing on the implications of political actions for freedom and justice.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight potential harm that could arise from the misuse of state power, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but does make a strong accusation against a public figure, which could be seen as disrespectful. However, it is within the bounds of political critique.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes awareness about the potential misuse of power, which can foster understanding and vigilance among the public. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks beyond the political critique, maintaining a focus on actions rather than personal attributes. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   By raising concerns about the misuse of state power, the statement uses its platform to address a significant societal issue, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]