The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the credibility of the Steele Dossier and its implications for the Justice Department and FISA warrants.
- The statement does not appear to intentionally cause harm, but the use of strong language ('bullshit') could be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful to civil discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the strong language could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on presenting a critical viewpoint.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide a platform for constructive dialogue or address counterarguments, and the use of strong language could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication in the statement that the author acknowledges or corrects mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the author's influence to address a public issue, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by informing the public. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as not using the platform responsibly due to the inflammatory language.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.