The statement engages in a public discourse about the validity of the Steele dossier and its implications on political narratives. The tone is confrontational and challenges the credibility of the dossier and those defending it. The intent appears to be to question the accuracy of the dossier and to provoke a response from the other party in the conversation.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses a confrontational and dismissive tone, potentially escalating the conflict. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in a public argument and uses a dismissive tone. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on challenging and discrediting the other party. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a confrontational tone and does not provide substantive evidence or arguments to support its claims. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.