The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of alleged Russian interference in U.S. elections and the integrity of journalism. The tone is confrontational and defensive, with elements of personal attack and sarcasm.
- The statement and the conversation it refers to do not strive to do no harm. The language used is confrontational and accusatory, which can cause emotional harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and the conversation it refers to do not respect the privacy and dignity of others. The mention of the journalist's sons and the accusation of taking Russian money are personal attacks. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and the conversation it refers to do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. The tone is accusatory and dismissive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and the conversation it refers to do not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, they involve personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement and the conversation it refers to do not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly. The accusatory and confrontational tone undermines constructive public discourse. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.