Matt Taibbi

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -52
9/6/2024, 1:29:51 AM
X
In reply to:
♞ Steven Douglas 🇺🇸
@StevieDougie
·
500d
@mtaibbi Kamala's entire communist platform, along with Putin's hearty endorsement of her, that might be one example. Just spitballing.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
500d
Give me an example of “towing Putin’s line.”
Ralph
@AndyShortsleeve
·
500d
@mtaibbi Tick tock Matty Boy. All you weirdo former journalists towing Putin’s line are going to be investigated. What a glorious day.

The statement '@StevieDougie Never mentioned either thing. What are you talking about?' is a direct response to a previous comment in a conversation about political figures and alleged endorsements. The tone is defensive and seeks clarification or correction of a perceived misstatement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a straightforward request for clarification. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by asking for clarification, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement implicitly acknowledges the possibility of a mistake by seeking clarification, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]