In reply to:
The statement engages in a discussion about censorship and the First Amendment rights of American influencers, which are public issues. The tone is assertive and aims to clarify a point about the implications of banning Russian State TV in the United States.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is focused on a legal and policy issue rather than personal attacks or harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying a point about censorship and First Amendment rights. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate in its delivery. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point in the conversation. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing the implications of censorship and the First Amendment. It uses the platform responsibly to contribute to a public debate. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.