The statement by @Ryandally08 and the subsequent reply by @Ryandally08 to @jaketapper constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about public issues, specifically the harassment of a public figure and the broader context of political and social tensions.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement by @Ryandally08 does not directly cause harm, but it does imply a justification for harassment, which can be harmful.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement by @Ryandally08 does not respect the privacy and dignity of others and can be seen as endorsing harassment, which violates this principle.
[-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement by @Ryandally08 does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to justify harassment based on political differences.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement by @Ryandally08 does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It implies a personal attack and does not foster a productive conversation.
[-2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement by @Ryandally08 does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly. It seems to endorse harassment, which is not a responsible use of free speech.
[-2]