Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the harassment of a public figure, Dana Bash, in the context of the Israel-Hamas conflict. It engages with the topic of antisemitism and the behavior of protesters, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it generalizes and potentially inflames tensions by attributing the actions of some protesters to all 'pro-pal protesters.' This could exacerbate divisions and harm public dialogue. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of Dana Bash but accuses the protesters of harassment and antisemitism without providing substantial evidence. This could be seen as a form of cyberbullying or hate speech against the protesters. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a confrontational tone and does not seek to understand the motivations of the protesters. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a sweeping generalization about the protesters and attributes their actions to antisemitism without engaging with their specific grievances or arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly. It makes broad accusations that could contribute to further polarization and conflict. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.