Robert Costa

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 107

The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant legal and political issue involving a former president and its potential impact on the upcoming election. The tone is neutral and factual, providing information about a judicial decision and its timing.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions as it merely reports a factual event without inflammatory language. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the legal proceedings and does not delve into personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values. It remains neutral and factual.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, but it also does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It simply reports a judicial decision.
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by providing factual information about a public issue. [+1]