Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement discusses a public policy decision made by Gavin Newsom regarding a proposed law for state-supported home loans for undocumented immigrants. It addresses a societal issue and provides a rationale for the decision, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language and presents the information in a neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement provides a rationale for the decision, which can promote understanding, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the policy decision and its rationale. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By explaining the rationale behind the veto, the statement uses its influence to inform the public about a significant policy decision, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by providing a clear and reasoned explanation for the decision. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.