The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing a serious and sensitive issue involving the death of an activist at a protest. The statement contrasts the media coverage from two different countries, implying a discrepancy in the reporting and potentially criticizing the media's handling of the event.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to polarization by implying bias in media coverage. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of the individual involved but uses their death to make a broader point about media bias, which could be seen as insensitive.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it highlights a perceived inconsistency in media reporting, which could foster distrust. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a pointed remark without offering a solution or inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight an issue of media bias, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by calling for more accurate reporting. However, it does so in a way that may not foster constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.