Dileep George
@dileeplearning
·
492d
The statement involves a critique of a public figure's understanding of a technical subject, which can be considered public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm, but the tone is dismissive and could be perceived as condescending, which may indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of the person being criticized.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the other person's understanding without providing a constructive explanation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a personal attack by suggesting the person is 'out of touch' and 'making up' how something works, rather than focusing on the argument or evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible due to its dismissive and condescending tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.