In reply to:
John M. Donnelly
@johnmdonnelly
·
139d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to healthcare and hospital misdiagnosis, which is a significant societal concern. The tone is factual and somewhat critical, aiming to highlight a perceived lack of journalistic inquiry into the matter.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is factual and does not use inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by pointing out a gap in journalistic inquiry, which could lead to more awareness and empathy regarding the issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting a lack of inquiry without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to a public issue, which can be seen as an effort for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.