Jill Stien

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -114

The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant international policy issue, specifically the U.S. military aid to Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The tone is assertive and proposes specific actions to influence the peace process. The intent is to advocate for a change in U.S. foreign policy and to hold the Israeli government accountable for its actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to do no harm by advocating for peace and accountability, but the aggressive tone and the call for international arrest warrants could be seen as potentially harmful or inflammatory.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on policy rather than personal attacks, although the mention of international arrest warrants for Netanyahu could be seen as a personal attack.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy for the Palestinian cause but may lack balance by not addressing the complexities of the conflict or the perspectives of all parties involved.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of U.S. foreign policy and the Israeli government's actions but could be seen as engaging in a personal attack against Netanyahu.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to advocate for a significant policy change that the speaker believes would better society by promoting peace and justice.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to address a critical international issue, but the tone and specific proposals may be seen as polarizing.