Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -114

The statement is a passionate critique of media coverage regarding the situation in Gaza. It accuses a journalist of failing to report on the deaths of people in Gaza and labels the situation as genocide. The tone is accusatory and urgent, aiming to call attention to what the speaker perceives as a significant issue of public concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement's accusatory tone could be seen as harmful, as it directly attacks a journalist's integrity without providing specific evidence. This could be considered a violation of the principle to do no harm with words and actions.Ā [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the professional integrity of a specific individual in a public manner, which could be seen as a partial violation of respecting the dignity of others.Ā [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the situation in Gaza, but its confrontational tone may undermine this goal. It partially aligns with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it makes a personal attack on the journalist. This is a violation of the principle to avoid personal attacks and engage in constructive dialogue.Ā [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to raise awareness about an issue, but the confrontational and accusatory tone may not be considered responsible or with integrity. This is a partial violation of using the platform responsibly.Ā [-1]