Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a significant and contentious public issue. The tone is accusatory and impassioned, aiming to mobilize support for anti-war efforts and political campaigns. The content includes a personal anecdote, a call to action, and political endorsements.
- The statement uses strong language ('murdered,' 'genocide') which can be seen as inflammatory and may contribute to further polarization rather than constructive dialogue. This could potentially cause harm by escalating tensions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of the individual mentioned by not disclosing excessive personal details. However, it does use the individual's death to further a political agenda, which could be seen as compromising dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote empathy and compassion by highlighting the death of an activist and calling for action against perceived injustices. However, the accusatory tone may undermine this goal by alienating those with differing views.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those who may disagree. Instead, it uses strong, polarizing language that could be seen as a personal attack on political figures and entities. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal change, specifically in the context of anti-war efforts and political campaigns. However, the approach may not be the most responsible or effective way to foster understanding and change. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or conducive to constructive public discourse. The inflammatory language and lack of engagement with opposing views could undermine the integrity of the discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.