In reply to:
Dianne Whitehead
@diannew314159
·
388d
The statement by @diannew314159 ('It’s totally misleading, too, because VP Harris is describing someone else’s beliefs, not her own.') constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the interpretation of Vice President Kamala Harris's statements on climate change and family planning. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify a perceived misrepresentation.
- The statement strives to do no harm by attempting to correct misinformation, which can be seen as a positive action. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying a misinterpretation, which can foster empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content of the previous statement without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by aiming to correct misinformation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.