Gary Marcus

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 47
9/7/2024, 12:13:26 AM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
348d
@diannew314159 It’s totally misleading, too, because VP Harris is describing someone else’s beliefs, not her own.
Dianne Whitehead
@diannew314159
·
388d
This is nonsense. He might as well be saying lizard people secretly control the planet. It's no less ridiculous, or based in reality. He is not a serious person, and nothing he says should be treated as such. He is a spoiled brat, entitled, white supremacist having a tantrum.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
389d
@JDVance Shamala is an extinctionist. The natural extension of her philosophy would be a de facto holocaust for all of humanity!

The statement by @diannew314159 constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the debate around population growth and climate anxiety. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, suggesting that the person being addressed should be more informed about the research on the topic if they are serious about their stance on population growth.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause direct harm, but the dismissive tone and use of the facepalm emoji could be seen as condescending, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does border on disrespect by implying the other person is uninformed.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a critical stance without offering constructive dialogue or information. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the other person's knowledge without providing specific counterarguments or evidence. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    Not applicable as the statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    Not applicable as the statement does not clearly use influence for societal betterment.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its approach.