Jake Tapper

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 68

The statement 'Well we never ran an illegal foreign influence op for a murderous autocrat so I think that’s a win.' is a sarcastic response to a critique of The Bulwark's positions. It engages in public discourse by addressing the integrity and actions of a public entity in a political context.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive and unconstructive. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Neutral.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more defensive and sarcastic. Minor violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a sarcastic retort rather than a reasoned argument. Significant violation. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its sarcastic and dismissive tone. Minor violation. [-1]