In reply to:
Steven Marlow
@sd_marlow
·
344d
The statement 'We are too far on the above to discuss it' appears to be a dismissive response to a complex and heated political discussion. The conversation involves significant public discourse on political ideologies, policy discussions, and the actions of public figures. The dismissive nature of the statement does not contribute constructively to the dialogue and may be seen as avoiding engagement with the substantive issues raised.
- The statement does not strive to do harm, but it also does not contribute positively to the discussion.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or harassment.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it avoids engaging with the issues. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, and instead dismisses the conversation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.