In reply to:
QuintessaX (xer/zey) 🏳🌈
@QXVL3
·
131d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
131d
The statement 'The war ends when Hamas gives up and releases the hostages.' But you realize that's not happening, right?' is part of a public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the conflict between Israel and Hamas. The tone is assertive and somewhat pessimistic, indicating a belief that the situation is unlikely to change. The intent appears to be to emphasize the perceived intransigence of Hamas and the inevitability of continued conflict.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a fatalistic view of the conflict, which might not be constructive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does place the blame solely on one party, which could be seen as lacking in respect for the complexity of the situation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on asserting a point of view. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it also does not invite constructive dialogue or criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint, but it could be argued that it lacks a sense of responsibility and integrity in promoting a more nuanced discussion.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.