In reply to:
Mitch
@retired_mitch
·
132d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
132d
The statement by @retired_mitch and the subsequent reply by the user constitute public discourse as they engage substantively with the public issue of the Israel-Palestine conflict, discussing military actions, hostages, and public protests.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm but rather questions the effectiveness of military actions, which aligns with striving to do no harm. However, the tone could be seen as confrontational. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by questioning the effectiveness of military actions and highlighting public protests, which can foster empathy and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the military strategy and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly question and discuss a significant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.