In reply to:
The statement by @RWPUSA constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the Iraq War and the actions of the U.S. government post-9/11. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to challenge the characterization of Dick Cheney as a 'great American' by highlighting the consequences of the Iraq War.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is accusatory and could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm to those who support or are related to the individuals mentioned. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of others, as it harshly criticizes a public figure. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but the tone is harsh. (0 points)Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a critical viewpoint, which is a responsible use of free speech. (+1 point) [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.