Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 114
9/7/2024, 1:32:54 PM
X
In reply to:
The Retro Burn
@burntheretro
·
340d
@GaryMarcus That would officially give them cult status.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
340d
@burntheretro No it won’t. Hope never dies.
The Retro Burn
@burntheretro
·
340d
@GaryMarcus Patience. The next OpenAI release will settle the whole debate one way or another.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
340d
How many people have to see it before we call it?

The statement 'Why wait?' is part of a broader conversation about the future of AI and its impact on society, which constitutes public discourse. The conversation involves opinions on the potential outcomes of AI developments and their societal implications, as highlighted by the attached image from the Los Angeles Times discussing the AI bubble.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement 'Why wait?' does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the need for patience and careful consideration in AI development. This could be interpreted as a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is a brief, somewhat provocative remark that does not contribute constructively to the dialogue. This is a minor violation of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a short, somewhat dismissive comment that does not foster a deeper discussion or understanding. This is a minor violation of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-1]