Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 115

The statement 'Of course Google duplex was the same gimmick years ago' is part of a broader conversation about the state of AI technology and its perceived overhype. The tone is somewhat dismissive, suggesting that Google Duplex, an AI technology, was also a gimmick similar to the current AI voice technology being discussed. The intent appears to be to draw a parallel between past and present AI technologies, implying that both were overhyped and underdelivered.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a critique of technology rather than individuals, so it aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and dismissive, which does not contribute positively to the discourse. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It dismisses the technology as a 'gimmick' without providing a detailed rationale or engaging in a deeper dialogue. [-1]