Gary Marcus

The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with the societal implications of AI technology, particularly its potential for misuse in surveillance and manipulation. The tone is a mix of concern and constructive dialogue, with a focus on ensuring technology benefits all rather than a select few.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement and conversation strive to do no harm by raising awareness about potential risks associated with AI technology. [+2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The conversation respects the privacy and dignity of others by discussing AI's societal impact without targeting individuals. [+2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The dialogue promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by addressing concerns about AI's dark side and advocating for technology that benefits everyone. [+2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The conversation engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, particularly in the exchange between @ValWanders_Ai and @GaryMarcus, without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The participants use their influence to discuss important societal issues related to AI, aiming for the betterment of society. [+2]